Discussion thread Part III: Advanced Applications

Building Customisable High Performance C++ Applications

Discussion thread Part III: Advanced Applications

Postby Cuchulainn » Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:42 pm

chapters 14 - 20
User avatar
Cuchulainn
 
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:48 pm
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Section 18.3 The Pathwise Method

Postby Chris » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:26 am

I think I spotted a couple of minor typos in section 18.3 The Pathwise Method, on page 493:



In [18.14] the second line is \hat{\Delta}_{S_0}=0 and I think it should be \hat{\Delta}_{S_0}=1.



Same for [18.15], but also the "hat" is missing on \Delta, i.e. it reads \Delta_{S_0}=0 and should read \hat{\Delta}_{S_0}=1.



Going back a bit, though, in [18.11], (the derivative of [18.9] w.r.t. \phi), the last two terms have \hat{S}^\prime_n in them. With the primes on \mu and \sigma, this does not make sense, i.e. either drop the \hat{S}^\prime_n or write out the chain rule with \frac{\partial \mu}{\partial \hat{S}_n} \hat{S}^\prime_n. This what is done in the sentence just before [18.14] and in [18.14]:



"For example, if we denote the partial derivative with respect to the spot price and abbreviate the partial derivative..."



may I suggest that the sentence would be better as



"For example, if we denote the partial derivative with respect to the spot price with $\prime$ and abbreviate the partial derivative..."



Great book -- I am not this far along (Chap. 18) but I had a school project with the pathwise method so I was keen to read this chapter. Everyone seems to use the exact answer for the European call option when illustrating the pathwise method but to me the coolest thing is that you don't need to solve the SDE or (in this case know anything about lognormal distributions) in order to use the pathwise method... you can just differentiate the Euler scheme to get what you need.
Chris
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: London

Comments Chapter 18

Postby Lapsilago » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:01 pm

Thanks for your comments Chris.



You are right with your remarks! I will keep it and update it in a future version of the book.



Best, Lapsi
Lapsilago
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:30 pm
Location: Germany, Bonn

Postby Cuchulainn » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:24 pm

Lapsi,

Maybe an idea to have an ERRATA thread here? So that readers can view the corrected formula?



cheers



D
User avatar
Cuchulainn
 
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:48 pm
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Re: Discussion thread Part III: Advanced Applications

Postby emmasam » Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:04 pm

You're welcome, glad you enjoyed it
emmasam
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:35 pm


Return to Monte Carlo Frameworks (Duffy/Kienitz)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron