Chapter 10

[Cuchulainn]

great, you're welcome.



BTW what version of Excel are you using?

[steve]

I am using Excel 2003. Thanks.

great, you're welcome.



BTW what version of Excel are you using?

[steve]

Chapter 10 code compiled successfully in VC++ but NOT in g++ Linux.

Errors seem indicate that g++ does not understand STL syntax. Could you please advice how to compile the code in g++ Linux?

Thank you!



g++ version

[root@localhost chap10]# g++ -v

Using built-in specs.

Target: i386-redhat-linux

Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada --enable-java-awt=gtk --disable-dssi --enable-plugin --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0/jre --with-cpu=generic --host=i386-redhat-linux

Thread model: posix

gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)





Errors:

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:100: error: there are no arguments to ?Size? that depend on a template parameter, so

a declaration of ?Size? must be available

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:100: note: (if you use ?-fpermissive?, G++ will accept your code, but allowing the u

se of an undeclared name is deprecated)

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:100: error: there are no arguments to ?MinIndex? that depend on a template parameter

, so a declaration of ?MinIndex? must be available

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:103: error: there are no arguments to ?MinIndex? that depend on a template parameter

, so a declaration of ?MinIndex? must be available

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:103: error: there are no arguments to ?MaxIndex? that depend on a template parameter

, so a declaration of ?MaxIndex? must be available

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp: In member function ?Vector<V, I, S> Vector<V, I, S>::operator/(const V&) const?:

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:190: error: there are no arguments to ?Size? that depend on a template parameter, so

a declaration of ?Size? must be available

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:190: error: there are no arguments to ?MinIndex? that depend on a template parameter

, so a declaration of ?MinIndex? must be available

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:193: error: there are no arguments to ?MinIndex? that depend on a template parameter

, so a declaration of ?MinIndex? must be available

/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:193: error: there are no arguments to ?MaxIndex? that depend on a template parameter

, so a declaration of ?MaxIndex? must be available

Well, strange,fdmdirector.cpp is on the official CD... Did you look in chapter 10 directory?



The error message means that the namespace is defined twice. Maybe it was my addition to the test program, so just remove it once. It means the same code is being inserted twice (chapter 2)



BTW, as a check how many files in total do you have on the CD?

[Cuchulainn]

The 2006 code was built using VS2005. For gcc, the compiler handles template classes differntly, especally friends



Vector<T>

{

template <T1>

void foo(T1& t);



//..

};



this must be done in gcc. VS has no problems with



Vector<T>

{

template <T>

void foo(T& t);



//..

};

[steve]

It seems not work for me. I've changed as suggested. (original code and updated code below). But error is still same. it does not understand SIZE, MinIndex, MaxIndex:



/usr/data/CPP/CPP4FE/Utilities/VectorsAndMatrices/Vector.cpp:100: error: there are no arguments to ?SIZE? that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ?SIZE? must be available





--original:

template <class V, class I, class S>

Vector<V, I, S> Vector<V, I, S>::operator - () const

{ // Unary minus



// Create new vector of same size and same starting index

Vector<V, I, S> result(SIZE(), MinIndex());



// Copy all elements negative

for (I i=MinIndex(); i<=MaxIndex(); i++)

result[i] = - (*this)[i];



// Return result

return result;

}



--updated:

template <class V1, class I1, class S1>

Vector<V1, I1, S1> Vector<V1, I1, S1>::operator - () const

{ // Unary minus



// Create new vector of same size and same starting index

Vector<V1, I1, S1> result(SIZE(), MinIndex());



// Copy all elements negative

for (I1 i=MinIndex(); i<=MaxIndex(); i++)

result[i] = - (*this)[i];



// Return result

return result;

}

The 2006 code was built using VS2005. For gcc, the compiler handles template classes differntly, especally friends



Vector<T>

{

template <T1>

void foo(T1& t);



//..

};



this must be done in gcc. VS has no problems with



Vector<T>

{

template <T>

void foo(T& t);



//..

};

[Cuchulainn]

SIZE() ?? Don't know how you got this.

Size() is correct.

[steve]

Yeah, sorry for confusion.

Original code is Size() but I failed with Size(), so just try the luck with SIZE() or size() but all failed.

SIZE() ?? Don't know how you got this.

Size() is correct.

[steve]

FYI: I've tried simple example with vector. below code works fine, g++ does understand size(), begin() ...,



#include <iostream>

#include <vector>

#include <string>



using namespace std;



main()

{

vector<string> SS;



SS.push_back("The number is 10");

SS.push_back("The number is 20");

SS.push_back("The number is 30");



cout << "Loop by index:" << endl;



int ii;

for(ii=0; ii < SS.size(); ii++)

{

cout << SS[ii] << endl;

}



cout << endl << "Constant Iterator:" << endl;



vector<string>::const_iterator cii;

for(cii=SS.begin(); cii!=SS.end(); cii++)

{

cout << *cii << endl;

}



cout << endl << "Reverse Iterator:" << endl;



vector<string>::reverse_iterator rii;

for(rii=SS.rbegin(); rii!=SS.rend(); ++rii)

{

cout << *rii << endl;

}



cout << endl << "Sample Output:" << endl;



cout << SS.size() << endl;

cout << SS[2] << endl;



swap(SS[0], SS[2]);

cout << SS[2] << endl;

}

SIZE() ?? Don't know how you got this.

Size() is correct.

[/quote]

[R19et]

I too had this question and I thank you for your answer - I am trying to find a way to answer the first review question on chapter 414. Do you mean - how would we re-write rather than how would the the function be called?

[VonMorgan]

1>testBSPDE1.obj : error LNK2005: "double (__cdecl* BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP::sigma)(double,double)" (?sigma@BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP@@3P6ANNN@ZA) already defined in FDM.obj

1>testBSPDE1.obj : error LNK2005: "double (__cdecl* BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP::f)(double,double)" (?f@BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP@@3P6ANNN@ZA) already defined in FDM.obj
dianabol for sale
best legal steroids for sale
over the counter phentermine
hgh for men
Gynectrol
brutal force


1>testBSPDE1.obj : error LNK2005: "double (__cdecl* BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP::mu)(double,double)" (?mu@BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP@@3P6ANNN@ZA) already defined in FDM.obj

1>testBSPDE1.obj : error LNK2005: "double (__cdecl* BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP::IC)(double)" (?IC@BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP@@3P6ANN@ZA) already defined in FDM.obj

1>testBSPDE1.obj : error LNK2005: "double (__cdecl* BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP::BCR)(double)" (?BCR@BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP@@3P6ANN@ZA) already defined in FDM.obj

1>testBSPDE1.obj : error LNK2005: "double (__cdecl* BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP::BCL)(double)" (?BCL@BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP@@3P6ANN@ZA) already defined in FDM.obj

1>testBSPDE1.obj : error LNK2005: "double (__cdecl* BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP::b)(double,double)" (?b@BlackScholesOneFactorIBVP@@3P6ANNN@ZA) already defined in FDM.obj

[R19et]

Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L vin: 1FATP8UH3K5159596


Lot sold for 20900

Auction: I buy fast

Lot number: 28658375

Date of sale: 12.05.2019

Year: 2019

VIN: 1FATP8UH3K5159596

Condition: Run and Drive

Engine: 2.3L I4 N

Mileage: 827 miles (Actual)

Seller: Avis Budget Group

Documents: CLEAR (Florida)

Location: Orlando (FL)

Estimated Retail Value:

Transmission: Automatic

Body color: Blue

Drive: Rear Wheel Drive

Fuel: Gasoline

Keys: Present

Notes: Not specified





The Shelby GT350 is an incredibly fast car with an intoxicating engine
What’s new
Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 6
You may think of the Mustang as a drag-strip special, a muscle car built for straight lines and stoplight hauls. Ford, though, is serious about making the iconic pony car a significant performance machine both at the drag strip and on the race track.
We’ve long heard about the GT350 and its magnificent engine. After finally getting some seat time, it’s clear that the Shelby lives up to the hype. Sure, it’s effortlessly fast and a bargain, but the screaming motor and stellar exhaust note is what makes this one of the most special cars on sale.


1FATP8UH3K5159596


1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L
1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L
1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L
1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L
1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L

[R19et]

Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L vin: 1FATP8UH3K5159596


Lot sold for 20900

Auction: I buy fast

Lot number: 28658375

Date of sale: 12.05.2019

Year: 2019

VIN: 1FATP8UH3K5159596

Condition: Run and Drive

Engine: 2.3L I4 N

Mileage: 827 miles (Actual)

Seller: Avis Budget Group

Documents: CLEAR (Florida)

Location: Orlando (FL)

Estimated Retail Value:

Transmission: Automatic

Body color: Blue

Drive: Rear Wheel Drive

Fuel: Gasoline

Keys: Present

Notes: Not specified





Source: Ford Motor Co.
Source: Ford Motor Co.
Source: Ford Motor Co.
Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 6
Also, we should note that Ford is coming out with a Shelby GT500 later this year. While it won’t have the crazy redline or insane sound of the flat-plane-crank V-8, it will make over 700 horsepower with the help of a supercharger. The GT350 may be best if you want a pure driver’s car, but the GT500 will officially be the top-dog Mustang when it hits showrooms.


1FATP8UH3K5159596


1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L
1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L
1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L
1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L
1FATP8UH3K5159596 Ford Mustang 2019 Blue 2.3L